<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lehigh faculty seminar in philosophy &#8211; The completeness of metaphysical fundamentalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnfsymons.com/2010/02/lehigh-faculty-seminar-in-philosophy-the-completeness-of-metaphysical-fundamentalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnfsymons.com/2010/02/lehigh-faculty-seminar-in-philosophy-the-completeness-of-metaphysical-fundamentalism/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the Incompleteness of Physicalism and the Possibility of Strong Emergence &#171; Philosophy @ HCC</title>
		<link>http://johnfsymons.com/2010/02/lehigh-faculty-seminar-in-philosophy-the-completeness-of-metaphysical-fundamentalism/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Incompleteness of Physicalism and the Possibility of Strong Emergence &#171; Philosophy @ HCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnfsymons.com/?p=187#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] at Lehigh where he proposes an argument that metaphysical physicalism is incomplete. Check it out, here. Why should we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Lehigh where he proposes an argument that metaphysical physicalism is incomplete. Check it out, here. Why should we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An argument against the completeness of physicalism &#171; Objects and Arrows</title>
		<link>http://johnfsymons.com/2010/02/lehigh-faculty-seminar-in-philosophy-the-completeness-of-metaphysical-fundamentalism/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>An argument against the completeness of physicalism &#171; Objects and Arrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnfsymons.com/?p=187#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] is understood as accounting for all the facts.  If you&#8217;d like to hear the talk, the audio is here.  Thanks to the generous and collegial philosophers at Lehigh for a great [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is understood as accounting for all the facts.  If you&#8217;d like to hear the talk, the audio is here.  Thanks to the generous and collegial philosophers at Lehigh for a great [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
